Pooled analysis of three pharmacokinetic studies comparing biosimilar MB02 and reference bevacizumab.

AIM: The aim of this study was to add robustness and provide further evidence on the bioequivalence, safety and immunogenicity between MB02 and reference bevacizumab. No similar study has been performed before with a biosimilar monoclonal antibody. METHODS: Population analysis by pooling data from three independent pharmacokinetic (PK) studies was performed. The studies had a single-dose, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group design and two studies, MB02-A-02-17 and MB02-A-05-18, compared MB02 to EU- and US-bevacizumab in Caucasian subjects, while study MB02-A-04-18 compared MB02 and EU-bevacizumab in Japanese participants. Primary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) and AUC from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t ). Secondary endpoints included other PK parameters, safety and immunogenicity. A sensitivity analysis using actual protein concentration as a correction factor was applied to primary PK parameters. RESULTS: Point estimates and 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of primary PK parameters for MB02, EU- and US-bevacizumab were all contained within the predefined bioequivalence margins (80%-125%) for all pairwise comparisons. The same results for all pairwise comparisons were observed when protein-corrected primary PK parameters were analyzed. Safety and immunogenicity were similar between MB02 and the EU- and US-reference bevacizumab in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis of three comparable PK studies further supports the bioequivalence of biosimilar MB02 to EU- and US-reference bevacizumab. No clinically meaningful differences in safety or immunogenicity were observed.

Population Pharmacokinetics of MYL-1402O, a Proposed Biosimilar to Bevacizumab and Reference Product (Avastin®) in Patients with Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: MYL-1402O is a bevacizumab (Avastin®) biosimilar. Pharmacokinetic and safety similarity of MYL-1402O and reference Avastin® authorized in the European Union (EU-Avastin®) and the US (US-Avastin®) was demonstrated in healthy subjects (phase I, NCT02469987). The key objectives of this study were to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model on pooled data from the phase I and phase III clinical studies to assess pharmacokinetic linearity of MYL-1402O and Avastin® across dose ranges, to assess the pharmacokinetic similarity of MYL-1402O and Avastin® in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC), and to explore potential covariates to account for systematic sources of variability in bevacizumab exposure. METHODS: Efficacy and safety of MYL-1402O compared with EU-Avastin® was investigated in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in patients with stage IV nsNSCLC (phase III, NCT04633564). PopPK models were developed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach (NONMEM® 7.3.0). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of Avastin® and MYL-1402O were adequately described with a two-compartment linear model. Fourteen covariates were found to be statistically significant predictors of bevacizumab pharmacokinectics. The impact of each covariate on area under the concentration-time curve, half-life, and maximum plasma concentration was modest, and ranges were similar between the treatment groups, MYL-1402O and EU-Avastin®, in patients with nsNSCLC. The pharmacokinectics of bevacizumab appeared to be linear. CONCLUSIONS: PopPK analysis revealed no significant differences between pharmacokinetics of MYL-1402O and Avastin® in patients with nsNSCLC. The developed PopPK model was considered robust, as it adequately described bevacizumab pharmacokinetics in healthy participants and nsNSCLC patients.

A phase I study comparing the biosimilarity of the pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody injection with Avastin® in healthy Chinese male subjects.

BACKGROUND: The biosimilar landscape for malignancies continues to grow, with several biosimilars for reference product bevacizumab currently available. Bevacizumab has been shown to be well tolerated; however, the safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody injection remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to that of Avastin® in healthy Chinese male volunteers. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and parallel-group study was performed on 88 healthy men who randomly (1:1) received either the test drug as an intravenous infusion of 3 mg/kg or Avastin®. The primary PK parameter was area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). Secondary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax), AUC from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), safety, and immunogenicity. Serum bevacizumab concentrations were measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups. The 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC0-t, Cmax and AUCinf between the test group and reference group were 91.71%-103.18%, 95.72%-107.49% and 91.03%-103.43%, respectively. These values were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80.00%-125.00%, demonstrating the biosimilarity of the test drug and Avastin®. Eighty-one treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, with a comparable incidence among the test group (90.91%) and the reference group (93.18%). No serious adverse events were reported. The incidence of ADA antibodies in the two groups was low and similar. CONCLUSION: In healthy Chinese men, PK similarity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to Avastin® was confirmed, with comparable safety and immunogenicity. Subsequent studies should investigate recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection in patients setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered 08/10/2019, CTR20191923.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Controlled Phase I Study Comparing the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity of SCT510 to Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Healthy Chinese Males.

BACKGROUND: SCT510 is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is intended as a candidate biosimilar of bevacizumab that is approved for various metastatic cancers.Please confirm change in wording to match definition for VEGF belowYes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics profiles, safety, and immunogenicity of SCT510 to bevacizumab (Avastin®) in healthy Chinese males. METHODS: This was a single-center, double-blind, parallel-group phase I study. A total of 84 participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single 3 mg/kg infusion of either SCT510 or bevacizumab and followed up for 99 days. Primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and the maximum observed concentration (Cmax). Secondary endpoints included safety and immunogenicity.Kindly check and confirm the edit made in the article title.Yes. RESULTS: A total of 82 subjects completed the study. Geometric means ratios (GMR) for AUC0-∞, AUC0-t, and Cmax were 0.88, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively, for SCT510 versus bevacizumab (USA). The 90% confidence intervals for GMRs of AUC0-∞, AUC0-t, and Cmax were all within the prespecified criteria (80-125%). No adverse events (AEs) led to study termination, and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. None of the anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) identified were found to be neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), and only one subject from the SCT510 group tested positive for the ADA at the day 99 visit. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of SCT510 were equivalent to bevacizumab (Avastin®). As a proposed biosimilar drug to bevacizumab, SCT510 was well tolerated in healthy Chinese males. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05113511.

99mTc-HYNIC/Cy7-Fab(Bevacizumab): su empleo como agente de imagen en mieloma múltiple / 99mTc-HYNIC/Cy7-Fab(Bevacizumab): its use as an imaging agent in Multiple Myeloma / 99mTc-HYNIC/Cy7-Fab (Bevacizumab): seu uso como agente de imagem em mieloma múltiplo

Introducción: el mieloma múltiple es un trastorno hematológico maligno y el segundo cáncer de la sangre más frecuente. El proceso de la angiogénesis tumoral es fundamental para el crecimiento y metástasis de muchos tipos de tumores, incluido en mieloma múltiple. Se sabe que la sobreexpresión del factor de crecimiento endothelial vascular se encuentra asociado a un mal pronóstico en esta patología, representando un blanco clave para la terapia anti-angiogénica en mieloma múltiple. El anticuerpo monoclonal Bevacizumab es capaz de unirse con gran afinidad al factor de crecimiento endothelial vascular bloqueando su acción. Objetivo: evaluar el Fab(Bevacizumab) marcado con 99mTc o Cy7 como potenciales agentes de imagen moleculares de la expresión de factor de crecimiento endothelial vascular en mieloma múltiple. Material y métodos: la expresión de factor de crecimiento endothelial vascular fue analizada mediante citometría de flujo en la línea celular huaman de mieloma múltiple, la MM1S. Fab(Bevacizumab) fue producido mediante digestión de Bevacizumab con papaína, conjugado a NHS-HYNIC-Tfa y radiomarcado con 99mTc. Se realizaron estudios de biodistribución y de tomografía computarizada por emisión del fotón simple. A su vez, Fab(Bevacizumab) fue marcado con Cy7 para obtener imágenes de fluorescencia in vivo hasta 96 horas. Resultados: el análisis por citometría de flujo en la línea celular MM1S reveló que la expresión de factor de crecimiento endothelial vascular es predominantemente intracelular. Los estudios de biodistribución y SPECT/CT del complejo 99mTc-HYNIC-Fab(Bevacizumab) mostraron una rápida eliminación sanguínea y una significativa captación a nivel renal y tumoral. Las imágenes por fluorescencia empleando Cy7-Fab(Bevacizumab) permitieron la visualización tumoral hasta 96 h p.i. Conclusiones: logramos visualizar la expresión de factor de crecimiento endothelial vascular in vivo en mieloma múltiple mediante el empleo del fragmento Fab del anticuerpo anti-VEGF (Bevacizumab) marcado con 99mTc y Cy7. Estos nuevos agentes de imagen molecular podrían ser empleados potencialmente en el ámbito clínico para la estadificación y el seguimiento de pacientes con mieloma múltiple, mediante la visualización radioactiva in vivo de la expresión de factor de crecimiento endothelial vascular en todo el cuerpo. La imagen óptica de estos trazadores mejoraría el muestreo tumoral y podría guiar la extirpación quirúrgica.

Introduction: Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy and the second most common blood cancer. The process of tumor angiogenesis is central to the growth and metastasis of many types of tumors, including multiple myeloma. Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor is known to be associated with poor prognosis in this pathology, representing a key target for anti-angiogenic therapy in multiple myeloma. The monoclonal antibody Bevacizumab is able to bind with high affinity to vascular endothelial growth factor blocking its action. Objective: to evaluate 99mTc- or Cy7-labeled Fab(Bevacizumab) as potential molecular imaging agents of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in multiple myeloma. Methods: Vascular endothelial growth factor expression was analyzed by flow cytometry in the multiple myeloma huaman cell line, MM1S. Fab(Bevacizumab) was produced by digestion of Bevacizumab with papain, conjugated to NHS-HYNIC-Tfa and radiolabeled with 99mTc. Biodistribution and single photon emission computed tomography studies were performed. In turn, Fab(Bevacizumab) was labeled with Cy7 to obtain in vivo fluorescence images up to 96 hours. Results: Flow cytometry analysis in the MM1S cell line revealed that vascular endothelial growth factor expression is predominantly intracellular. Biodistribution and SPECT/CT studies of the 99mTc-HYNIC-Fab(Bevacizumab) complex showed rapid blood clearance and significant renal and tumor uptake. Fluorescence imaging using Cy7-Fab(Bevacizumab) allowed tumor visualization up to 96 h p.i. Conclusions: we were able to visualize vascular endothelial growth factor expression in vivo in multiple myeloma using the Fab fragment of the anti-VEGF antibody (Bevacizumab) labeled with 99mTc and Cy7. These new molecular imaging agents could potentially be employed in the clinical setting for staging and monitoring of patients with multiple myeloma by in vivo radioactive visualization of vascular endothelial growth factor expression throughout the body. Optical imaging of these tracers would improve tumor sampling and could guide surgical excision.

Introdução: O mieloma múltiplo é uma malignidade hematológica e o segundo câncer de sangue mais comum. O processo de angiogênese tumoral é fundamental para o crescimento e a metástase de muitos tipos de tumores, incluindo o mieloma múltiplo. Sabe-se que a superexpressão do fator de crescimento endotelial vascular está associada a um prognóstico ruim no mieloma múltiplo, representando um alvo importante para a terapia antiangiogênica no mieloma múltiplo. O anticorpo monoclonal Bevacizumab é capaz de se ligar com alta afinidade ao fator de crescimento endotelial vascular e bloquear sua ação. Objetivo: avaliar o Fab(Bevacizumab) marcado com 99mTc ou Cy7 como possíveis agentes de imagem molecular da expressão do fator de crescimento endotelial vascular no mieloma múltiplo. Métodos: A expressão do fator de crescimento endotelial vascular foi analisada por citometria de fluxo na linha celular de mieloma múltiplo MM1S. O Fab(Bevacizumab) foi produzido pela digestão do Bevacizumab com papaína, conjugado com NHS-HYNIC-Tfa e radiomarcado com 99mTc. Foram realizados estudos de biodistribuição e tomografia computadorizada por emissão de fóton único. Por sua vez, o Fab(Bevacizumab) foi marcado com Cy7 para geração de imagens de fluorescência in vivo por até 96 horas. Resultados: A análise de citometria de fluxo na linha celular MM1S revelou que a expressão do fator de crescimento endotelial vascular é predominantemente intracelular. Os estudos de biodistribuição e SPECT/CT do complexo 99mTc-HYNIC-Fab(Bevacizumab) mostraram uma rápida depuração sanguínea e uma captação renal e tumoral significativa. A imagem de fluorescência usando Cy7-Fab(Bevacizumab) permitiu a visualização do tumor até 96 horas p.i. Conclusões: Conseguimos visualizar a expressão do fator de crescimento endotelial vascular in vivo no mieloma múltiplo usando o fragmento Fab do anticorpo anti-VEGF (Bevacizumab) marcado com 99mTc e Cy7. Esses novos agentes de imagem molecular poderiam ser usados no cenário clínico para o estadiamento e o monitoramento de pacientes com mieloma múltiplo, visualizando radioativamente a expressão do fator de crescimento endotelial vascular in vivo em todo o corpo. A geração de imagens ópticas desses traçadores melhoraria a amostragem do tumor e poderia orientar a excisão cirúrgica.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose study to assess bioequivalence of MB02 biosimilar after manufacturing iteration and reference bevacizumab.

To investigate and compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of MB02 products, before and after optimizing the manufacturing process, and reference bevacizumab to establish bioequivalence between them. In this randomized, double-blind, single dose, parallel study, 114 healthy male volunteers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a 1 mg/kg intravenous dose of MB02-SP, MB02-DM, or US-bevacizumab. The follow-up period was 100 days. PK similarity between them was determined using the standard bioequivalence criteria (0.80-1.25) for the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity and the maximum observed serum concentration. Study results showed that the PK profiles of bevacizumab were similar. Statistical analysis demonstrated that for each pairwise comparison there were no differences. The 90% CIs for the ratios of geometric least squares means were fully contained within the predefined similarity acceptance limits and ranged from 0.899 to 1.12 for area under the curve and from 0.887 to 1.11 for maximum concentration. A total of 159 adverse events were reported by 76 subjects who received the study drug. The majority (90.6%) of the reported adverse events were grade 1 in severity, with 9.4% as grade 2 in severity. None were considered as grade 3, 4, or 5. Treatment-induced anti-drug antibodies incidence was 21.6%, 33.3%, and 23.7% for the treatment of MB02-SP, MB02-DM, and US-bevacizumab, respectively. No subjects showed treatment-induced neutralizing anti-drug antibodies. This study demonstrates the PK, safety, and immunogenicity similarity and bioequivalence of MB02-SP, MB02-DM, and the reference product bevacizumab.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of FKB238, a new biosimilar of bevacizumab, in healthy participants.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of single intravenous doses of FKB238, a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab, with European Union (EU)-approved and United States (US)-licensed bevacizumab in healthy participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, 99 healthy men received 5 mg of FKB238, EU-bevacizumab, or US-bevacizumab in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio by intravenous infusion. PK, immunogenicity, adverse events, local tolerability, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and safety tests of blood and urine were assessed before and up to 99 days after treatment. RESULTS: The 90% confidence interval for the ratios of the primary (area under the curve ((AUC)0-t and AUC0-inf) and secondary (maximum concentration (Cmax) and elimination half-life (T1/2)) geometric mean PK parameters were entirely within the acceptance range for bioequivalence of 0.80 - 1.25 for all 3 pairwise comparisons by analysis of covariance, with baseline characteristics of age and body weight as covariates. FKB238 was well tolerated in healthy participants, and anti-drug antibody (ADA) incidence was low and similar in all treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the PK similarity of FKB238 to both EU-bevacizumab and US-bevacizumab after a single intravenous infusion. FKB238 was well tolerated in healthy participants, and there was no difference in ADA incidence among the 3 products.

Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, Safety, and Immunogenicity of LY01008 and Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: LY01008 had been identified as being highly similar to the bevacizumab reference product in the pharmacy and pharmacology terms. The primary objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the biosimilar candidate LY01008 with that of the bevacizumab (Avastin®) reference product after a single intravenous infusion in healthy Chinese adults. The secondary objective was to compare the safety and immunogenicity of LY01008 with those of bevacizumab. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, phase I study, 102 male subjects aged 18-45 years were randomized 1:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion of 3 mg/kg LY01008 or bevacizumab. Before the pivotal section, 12 healthy male subjects receiving a single intravenous (IV) infusion of 0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg LY01008 were screened to verify the safety and tolerability of LY01008. Primary endpoints included the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last quantifiable time point (AUC0-t), AUC from time zero to the infinity time (AUC0-inf), and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence intervals, CIs) of AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and Cmax of LY01008 to bevacizumab were 87.62% (82.91%, 92.61%), 87.27% (82.46%, 92.35%), and 96.45% (91.37%, 101.81%), respectively, in the pivotal section, which were within the prespecified equivalence margin of 80.00-125.00%. LY01008 and bevacizumab administered as a single 3 mg/kg intravenous dose were comparably well tolerated. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed. Nine subjects had antidrug antibodies (ADAs) (5 in the LY01008 group and 4 in the bevacizumab group) after dosing. No neutralizing antibody (Nab) was detected. CONCLUSION: LY01008, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), displayed pharmacokinetic similarity to bevacizumab, and good safety and tolerability profiles. The data from this trial provide fundamental information for further development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration ID: CTR20170191.

A pharmacokinetics study of proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O vs EU-bevacizumab and US-bevacizumab.

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-specific angiogenesis in some cancers. MYL-1402O is a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar. METHODS: The primary objective of this single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, phase 1 study in healthy male volunteers was to evaluate bioequivalence of MYL-1402O to EU and US-reference bevacizumab, and EU-reference bevacizumab to US-reference bevacizumab. The primary pharmacokinetic parameter was area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞). Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using general linear models of analysis of variance. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Of 111 enrolled subjects, 110 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis (MYL-1402O, n = 37; EU-reference bevacizumab, n = 36; US-reference bevacizumab, n = 37). Bioequivalence was demonstrated between MYL-1402O and EU-reference bevacizumab, MYL-1402O and US-reference bevacizumab, and between EU- and US-reference bevacizumab where least squares mean ratios of AUC0-∞ were close to 1, and 90% CIs were within the equivalence range (0.80-1.25). Secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC from 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration [AUC0-t], peak serum concentration [Cmax], time to Cmax, elimination rate constant, and elimination half-life) were also comparable, with 90% CIs for ratios of AUC0-t and Cmax within 80-125%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all three treatment groups and were consistent with clinical data for bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: MYL-1402O was well tolerated and demonstrated pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to EU-reference bevacizumab and US-reference bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers. No new significant safety issues emerged (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02469987; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT, 2014-005621-12; June 12, 2015).

A randomized, double blind, single dose, comparative study of the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of MB02 (bevacizumab biosimilar) and reference bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers.

AIMS: The pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between MB02, a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, and reference bevacizumab approved from the USA (US-bevacizumab) and European Union (EU-bevacizumab) was evaluated. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. METHODS: In this phase 1, randomized, double blind, single dose, parallel group study, 114 healthy male volunteers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a 3 mg/kg intravenous dose of MB02, US-bevacizumab or EU-bevacizumab, and evaluated for 100 days. PK similarity between MB02 and reference bevacizumab was determined using the standard bioequivalence criteria (0.80-1.25) for the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-∞) ) and the maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ). RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar across treatment groups. All study drugs exhibited similar PK profile. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric lead square means ratios for the primary parameters AUC(0-∞) and Cmax for MB02, US-bevacizumab and EU-bevacizumab were fully contained within the pre-defined bioequivalence limits for the 3 pairwise comparisons: AUC(0-∞) (MB02:US-bevacizumab 0.998 [0.944 to 1.05]; MB02:EU-bevacizumab 1.07 [1.00 to 1.14]; and US-bevacizumab:EU-bevacizumab 0.934 [0.884 to 0.988]) and Cmax (MB02:US-bevacizumab 0.983 [0.897 to 1.08]; MB02:EU-bevacizumab 1.06 [0.976 to 1.16]; and; US-bevacizumab: EU-bevacizumab 0.926 [0.851 to 1.01]). Treatment emergent adverse events were reported in 87 subjects (76.3%), most being mild and with comparable incidence among treatment groups. Thirty-three subjects (28.9%) reported 56 possibly related treatment emergent adverse events with comparable incidence across treatments, the most frequent being headache (10.5%) and fatigue (3.5%). Anti-drug antibody incidence was low and similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the PK similarity and bioequivalence of MB02 to the reference bevacizumab, whether approved from USA or EU. The safety and immunogenicity profile of MB02 was shown also to be similar to the bevacizumab reference product (NCT04238663).

Suprachoroidal delivery of bevacizumab in rabbit in vivo eyes: Rapid distribution throughout the posterior segment.

PURPOSE: To test the in-vivo bio-distribution and safety of bevacizumab delivery into the suprachoroidal space (SCS) using a novel injection system in a large eye model. METHODS: Bevacizumab (1.25 mg) was injected into the vitreous (IVT, 50 µL, n = 12) or the SCS, (150 µL, n = 37) of live rabbits. Immunofluorescence and ELISA were used to assess bevacizumab distribution. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, SD-OCT and fundus imaging, electroretinogram, and histology analysis were performed for safety assessment. RESULTS: Bevacizumab was observed throughout the choroid layers up to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), within 1 h following SCS injection. The Cmax of bevacizumab in the retina/choroid was 1043 ± 597 µg/gr tissue (mean ± standard error), 40-fold higher than in IVT injected eyes (p = 0.0339). One day following SCS injection, bevacizumab was detected throughout the posterior pole with a two-fold lower concentration. One week post-SCS injection, bevacizumab concentration in the retina/choroid dropped to 2.36 ± 1.32 µg/gr tissue (p = 0.034 vs. 1 h), with a half-life of 20 h. No suprachoroidal blebs, retinal detachment, hemorrhages, inflammation or changes in retinal function were observed up to 2 months following SCS injection. Elevated IOP (+16 mmHg) was observed two minutes post-SCS injection and spontaneously returned to baseline levels within 10 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The novel injection system enabled a minimally invasive, safe, and consistent delivery of bevacizumab with rapid distribution throughout the choroid layers up to the RPE in large eyes. Large volumes of anti-angiogenic are delivered in close proximity to the retina due to the high volume distribution.

A randomized phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics of a bevacizumab (HD204) biosimilar to European Union- and United States of America-sourced bevacizumab.

PURPOSE: This first-in-human study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence between HD204 and the European Union (EU)-sourced bevacizumab, between HD204 and the United States of America (US)-sourced bevacizumab, and between EU-sourced and US-sourced bevacizumab (NCT03390673). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 3-way parallel group, single-dose comparative PK study, healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a single 1 mg/kg intravenous dose of HD204, EU-sourced bevacizumab or US-sourced bevacizumab. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. PK equivalence was determined using the pre-defined equivalence margin of 0.8-1.25 in terms of AUC(0-∞) for the pairwise comparisons. FINDINGS: Baseline demographics for the 119 randomized subjects were similar across the three groups. The 90% CIs for the ratio of the geometric means of HD204 to US-sourced bevacizumab, HD204 to EU-sourced bevacizumab, and EU-sourced to US-sourced bevacizumab were all within the interval of 80% to 125% for AUC0-inf, thus demonstrating equivalency in the PK properties for all three treatment groups. Similarly, the ratio of the geometric means for AUC0-last and Cmax were all within the 80% and 125% margins, supporting the robustness of the primary findings. All other PK parameters, including the half-life (t1/2) clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd) and time of maximum concentration (tmax), were comparable. There was no difference between the 3 treatment arms in terms of vital signs, laboratory tests and adverse events. None of the subjects treated with HD204 had positive ADA results. IMPLICATIONS: HD204 demonstrates equivalent pharmacokinetic profiles compared to those of both US-sourced and EU-sourced bevacizumab. (NCT03390673).

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of trastuzumab and bevacizumab in early-stage breast cancer.

AIMS: To describe the sources of interindividual variability of bevacizumab and trastuzumab pharmacokinetics in early-stage breast cancer, and to study the relationship between exposure and both early clinical response and specific adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 86) received 6 cycles of docetaxel + trastuzumab. Early tumour response was assessed by determination of the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) variation (ΔSUVmax) after 1 cycle using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET. Early poor responders (ΔSUVmax < 70%) also received bevacizumab from cycle 3 to cycle 6. Sources of interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of both antibodies were studied by population compartment modelling. Exposure as assessed by area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) was compared between responders and non-responders and between patients experiencing specific adverse events or not. RESULTS: A two-compartment model described the pharmacokinetics of both antibodies satisfactorily. Their central volume of distributions (Vc) increased with body surface area and their elimination half-lives were shorter (~14 days) than previously reported (~26-28 days). There was a time-dependent increase in trastuzumab Vc, positively correlated to baseline SUVmax. Bevacizumab elimination rate (k10) was positively correlated with ΔSUVmax measured at the end of the first cycle. Bevacizumab had no significantly influence on trastuzumab pharmacokinetics. No relationship between exposure and clinical response or occurrence of adverse events was found. CONCLUSION: Tumour uptake as assessed by SUVmax influences the pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab and trastuzumab. In early-stage breast cancer, elimination half-lives of these therapeutic monoclonal antibodies may be shorter than those previously reported in more advanced disease.

A randomized, single-dose, pharmacokinetic equivalence study comparing MB02 (proposed biosimilar) and reference bevacizumab in healthy Japanese male volunteers.

PURPOSE: MB02 is a biosimilar to bevacizumab that has demonstrated similar physicochemical and functional properties in in vitro studies to the reference bevacizumab (Avastin®). This study aims to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of MB02 to the reference bevacizumab in Japanese population. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, single-dose PK study, was performed in healthy Japanese male volunteers. Subjects were equally randomized (1:1) to receive a single (3 mg/kg) IV dose of MB02 or reference bevacizumab. PK assessments were done up to 70 days post-dose. Non-compartmental parameters were calculated. PK similarity was determined using predefined equivalence range (0.80-1.25) for the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞). Immunogenicity samples were taken pre-dose and up to day 70. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: In total, 48 subjects (24 in each treatment group) were dosed. Consequently to the observed similar PK profile, the 90% confidence interval for the geometric means ratio for the primary PK endpoint, AUC0-∞, was within the predefined equivalence range (0.981-1.11). Forty-seven treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 20 subjects (41.7%) with comparable incidence among MB02 and reference bevacizumab groups (22 and 25, respectively), none of them was severe or serious. Anti-drug antibodies incidence was low and similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic similarity of MB02 to reference bevacizumab was evidenced in Japanese healthy subjects, with comparable safety and immunogenicity profile between treatments. This study supports the biosimilarity of MB02 to reference bevacizumab in Japanese population. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04238650.

Assessment of exposure-response relationship for bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Limited literature is available for bevacizumab exposure-response relationship and there is not a concentration threshold associated with an optimal disease control. This prospective observational study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) aims to evaluate, in a real-life setting, the relationship between bevacizumab through concentrations at steady state (Ctrough, SS) and disease control. Ctrough, SS were drawn, coinciding with the radiological evaluation of the response (progression or clinical benefit). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis was performed. To test the association between Ctrough, SS in each patient with overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), Cox proportional hazard models were developed. Data included 50 bevacizumab Ctrough, SS from 27 patients. The GEE model did not suggest any positive association between bevacizumab Ctrough, SS and clinical benefit (OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-1.02, p = 0.863). The Cox regression showed association between higher median Ctrough, SS with better OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73-1.01, p = 0.060), but not with PFS. We cannot confirm a relationship between bevacizumab Ctrough, SS and clinical benefit but this is the first real-world study trying to show a relationship between bevacizumab Ctrough, SS and disease control in mCRC. It was conducted in a small sample size which reduces the level of evidence. Further controlled randomized studies with a sufficient number of patients are required.

Chitosan coated nanoparticles for efficient delivery of bevacizumab in the posterior ocular tissues via subconjunctival administration.

In several ocular diseases, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level has been found to be unregulated. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF drug, is the most commonly used off level drug for diabetic retinopathy (DR). The present study was to evaluate the chitosan-coated poly (lactide-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (CS-PLGA NPs) for sustained and effective delivery of bevacizumab to posterior ocular tissues. The penetration of NP through sclera was studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). For pharmacokinetic study, bevacizumab loaded NPs were administered into the rat eye through subconjunctival injection (SCJ) and pharmacokinetic parameters were compared to drug solution. CLSM and pharmacokinetic study showed better penetration of formulation and higher concentration of bevacizumab in posterior ocular tissues. In retinopathy model, CS-PLGA NPs by SCJ route showed more reduction of VEGF level in retina than the topical and intravitreal administration of formulation. Thus, CS-coated PLGA NPs can be potentially useful as carriers to target retina.

Potential of three-step pretargeting radioimmunotherapy using biotinylated bevacizumab and succinylated streptavidin in triple-negative breast cancer xenograft.

OBJECTIVE: Pretargeting radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) is a promising approach that can reduce long-time retention of blood radioactivity and consequently reduce hematotoxicity. Among the PRIT strategies, the combination of biotin-conjugated mAb and radiolabeled streptavidin (StAv) is a simple and convenient method because of its ease of preparation. This study performed three-step (3-step) PRIT using the sequential injection of (1) biotinylated bevacizumab (Bt-BV), (2) avidin, and (3) radiolabeled StAv for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: Four biodistribution studies were performed using 111In in tumor-bearing mice to optimize each step of our PRIT methods. Further, a therapeutic study was performed with optimized 3-step PRIT using 90Y-labeled StAv. RESULTS: Based on the biodistribution studies, the protein dose of Bt-BV and avidin was optimized to 100 µg and 10 molar equivalent of BV, respectively. Succinylation of StAv significantly decreased the kidney accumulation level (with succinylation (6.96 ± 0.91) vs without succinylation (20.60 ± 1.47) at 1 h after injection, p < 0.0001) with little effect on the tumor accumulation level. In the therapeutic study, tumor growth was significantly suppressed in treatment groups with optimized 3-step PRIT using 90Y-labeled succinylated StAv compared to that of the no-treatment group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 3-step PRIT strategy of this study achieved fast blood clearance and low kidney uptake with little effect on the tumor accumulation level, and a certain degree of therapeutic effect was consequently observed. These results indicated that the pretargeting treatment of the current study may be effective for human TNBC treatment.

Phase I Study of Rucaparib in Combination with Bevacizumab in Ovarian Cancer Patients: Maximum Tolerated Dose and Pharmacokinetic Profile.

BACKGROUND: Targeted agents, such as antiangiogenic drugs (e.g., bevacizumab) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (e.g., rucaparib), have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent ovarian cancer. Evidence suggests that combinations of these two classes of targeted agents may result in synergistic antitumor activity. OBJECTIVE: The phase I portion of MITO 25 was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and the safety profile of rucaparib when administered in combination with bevacizumab as maintenance treatment for patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: This was a single-arm, phase I dose-escalation study. Cohorts of three patients were recruited to receive increasing rucaparib doses of 400 mg, 500 mg, or 600 mg twice daily for 28 days. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was administered at day 1 every 21 days. RESULTS: We enrolled nine patients. Two patients in the rucaparib 600-mg group had four grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events: increased in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, depression, and hallucinations. These were deemed to be dose-limiting toxicities related to rucaparib. Because these dose-limiting toxicities occurred in the 600-mg group and affected more than one in three patients, the maximum tolerated dose for rucaparib was considered 500 mg twice daily when combined with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg at day 1 every 21 days. There were no new safety concerns from using the combination. No substantial difference in pharmacokinetic parameters was found between the cohorts or in the pharmacokinetic profiles of rucaparib administered alone or with bevacizumab with respect to historical controls. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of rucaparib is 500 mg twice daily when co-administered with bevacizumab. The plasma concentration-time profiles of rucaparib in combination with bevacizumab suggest no pharmacokinetic interactions between the drugs. The randomized phase II portion of MITO 25 will further investigate rucaparib maintenance treatment with or without bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IV ovarian cancer who responded to carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03462212; registered March 2018.

A phase I, randomized, single-dose pharmacokinetic study comparing sb8 (bevacizumab biosimilar) with reference bevacizumab in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: To compare pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity between SB8, a bevacizumab biosimilar, and the European Union (EU) and United States (US) reference products (bevacizumab-EU, bevacizumab-US). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, and single-dose study, healthy volunteers were randomized to receive a 3 mg/kg dose of SB8, bevacizumab-EU, or bevacizumab-US via intravenous infusion. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf) and to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax). Bioequivalence was achieved if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of the geometric least squares means (LSMeans) of primary endpoints were within the predefined bioequivalence margins of 80.00-125.00%. Safety and immunogenicity were also investigated. RESULTS: The 90% CIs for the geometric LSMean ratios of AUCinf, AUClast and Cmax were all within the prespecified bioequivalence margins. Geometric LSMean ratios for SB8/bevacizumab-EU, SB8/bevacizumab-US and bevacizumab-EU/bevacizumab-US were 88.01%, 88.48% and 100.54% for AUCinf, 88.65%, 89.08% and 100.49% for AUClast and 99.59%, 101.15% and 101.56% for Cmax, respectively. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across treatment groups was comparable (SB8: 50.0%, bevacizumab-EU: 37.5%, bevacizumab-US: 53.8%). Most TEAEs were mild and considered as not related to the study drug. No deaths or treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred. Incidence of anti-drug antibodies was also comparable between all groups and no neutralizing antibodies were detected. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated pharmacokinetic bioequivalence and similar safety and immunogenicity profiles of SB8 to both reference products, bevacizumab-EU and bevacizumab-US, and of bevacizumab-EU to bevacizumab-US. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02453672 (submitted date); EudraCT number: 2015-001,026-41.

REVIEW OF OPHTHALMIC AND BREASTFEEDING MEDICINE EVIDENCE: Real and Theoretical Risks of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Administration in Lactating Women.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is limited research regarding the consequences of treating lactating mothers with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Balancing the need for vision-saving treatment, the benefits of breastfeeding, and the concern for affecting the newborn can present a conflict for both mothers and ophthalmologists. This review summarizes the state of the literature regarding the use of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents during breastfeeding along with details about their pharmacology. RESULTS: Bevacizumab and aflibercept have Fc domains subjecting them to FcRn recycling and extending their half-life compared with ranibizumab which is an antibody fragment and lacks the Fc domain. Case reports and small studies have shown that ranibizumab has the lowest serum concentration after intravitreal injection and the least effect on plasma-free VEGF concentrations and breastmilk VEGF levels. CONCLUSION: Clinical and pharmacologic data suggest that ranibizumab has less systemic circulation and effect on maternal serum and breastmilk VEGF levels when compared to bevacizumab and aflibercept. However, there is significant need for further research on the degree and duration to which intravitreal agents circulate systemically, what fraction is transferred into breastmilk and is absorbed, and whether this results in any functional adverse effects to the infant. Other factors to consider in the medical decision-making of lactating mothers necessitating intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment include the gestational and post-natal age of the child and whether it is feasible to avoid breastfeeding for the half-life duration of the intravitreal agent rather than ceasing breastfeeding altogether.